| {mosimage} |
Sidin Sunny Vadukut finds the greatest show on earth a bit of a bore. |
Perhaps it was Gary Bloom, one of the faceless voices on ESPN that one develops a taste for in due course of watching football, who said it. But whoever it was I was flabbergasted when the words were uttered. The best world cup in years, he said. The most number of goals and some of the most memorable moments on the pitch, Bloom gushed.
What nonsense.
By the time the final whistle is blown or, and some may say this is more likely, the last penalty of the shootout is blasted against the upright on the 9th of July, millions of football fans all around the world would have sat through the latest edition of the FIFA world cup. And most of them would have got up underwhelmed. For all its pageantry, pomp and splendour it has been a most dull tournament; one devoid of the wizards, underdogs and new heroes that the tournament is known to dish out fabulously every four years. Few games have risen to the standards that stay etched in memory for the years to come and except for the emergence of Zinedine Zidane in the last couple of games most so-called ‘tournament stars’ have all flattered to deceive.
Let us not even get started about the referees.
The tournament has simply failed to deliver on so many accounts.
Consistent Inconsistence
Not one team in the world cup has managed to seal its authority in this tournament with any permanence. The
Of the lot left in the last four, at the time of writing this story,
The hosts have, for all its worth, been the surprise package of the tournament. They started off confidently against
But sitting on a one goal lead is not a strategy that was Pekerman’s alone. Several times teams seemed to sit back on a single goal, choosing to soak up pressure rather than close the game with another goal.
Coach Potato
When teams loaded with some of the world’s best footballers seem to flounder against weaker sides one knows there is a problem with the brains in the dugout. All conversations about insipid coaching in the world cup will begin with Sven Goran Eriksson. And the Swede will have to field many questions. The English were clearly uncomfortable with the five people in midfield and the lone striker up front. There were times when the English looked completely devoid of ideas with the ball. Beckham provided the occasional flashes of brilliance and Joe Cole provided a wonder goal that will no doubt go into a prominent place in the 2006 highlights reel. But through the tournament it seemed Eriksson’s tactics was holding the English back. Why was Aaron Lennon used so sparingly when he clearly had the pace few of the others had? Why pick Theo Walcott at all if he was going to come along for the ride? Where were the Plan Bs when nothing on the pitch seemed to work.
After the disastrous penalty shootout against Portugal Eriksson said it was a poor result and they had performed badly in spite of having trained for the penalties. Insipid till the very end.
And this is not a singular phenomenon. Too many teams have descended into a ‘long ball and a prayer’ strategy too often when under pressure. Are the coaches running out of ideas? Are they leaving it all to the players on the pitch? Except flashes of brilliance from Van Basten and inspired performances from the coaches of the unfancied teams like
Game after game was full of hopeful shots from 30 and 40 yards. Several of them did become wonder goals and in the group stages it seemed as if strikers were trying to use the aerodynamics of the new Teamgeist ball. But as the tournament wore on it seemed more like desperate attempts at scoring when nothing else: strategy, substitutions or input from the dugout seemed to help.
The
Brazilian football, clichés aside, evokes the fiercest fan passions of possibly any team in any sport. So when I say that the defending World Champions were anything but special this World Cup a whole lot of feathers are going to get ruffled. But even the most ardent fan must admit: this Brazilian team was not a shade on the usual Brazilian outfit of wizards and magicians one has to come to expect, love and loathe.
Commentators and pundits erupted every time a Brazilian side-stepped a defender or thumped a shot over the crossbar. After every mediocre Brazilian performance the commentators refused to admit to the obvious. ‘Surely they are merely warming up,’ they said, ‘the best is yet to come.’ The Selecao met their first real challenge of the World Cup, France, in the quarter final and Fabien Barthez was tested by the Brazilian attack less than half a dozen times.
The Brazilians were by and large mediocre on every part of the pitch. Their best player in the tournament, arguably, was Robinho who was sparingly used as a substitute by coach Carlos Alberto. Ronaldo broke the all-time goal scoring record and intermittently sparkled in a tournament that was to be his swan song. Ronaldinho, like Lampard, was simply uninspired and a complete let down. Perhaps the demands of club football were taking their total on the world’s best footballer.
Men In Black
FIFA were determined to stamp out cheating and unsporting behaviour on the pitch. They may have succeeded had they not got it terribly wrong with many of their officials. The World Cup has had several controversial cards and sending-offs this time right down to the Rooney dismissal in the quarter-finals.
But there was still no shortage of play acting. Perhaps it is the surfeit of rules and edicts that is making consistent implementation a problem. Some commentators even said it is the desperate attempt to bring in referees from all over the world that has diluted quality.
FIFA must now see the need for a comprehensive program to train and develop officials. While this might still be early days to say if tools like video replays will be used, FIFA must surely now think of means to pull up wily footballers and save the game from poor decisions.
The Home Stretch
The tournament will now have an all-Europe set of teams in the semi-finals. Perhaps it is a reflection of the tournament quality that no clear winner has still emerged. There is no one you can really put your money on with any confidence. In the light of recent performance the French look formidable. They have beaten the favourites with energy to spare and are riding a wave of confidence. Zidane looks a frightful prospect for any opposition in his current form. Ribery, Henry and Vieira all seem to be peaking with perfect timing.
Which leaves the hosts and the Azzuri. Both sides have turned in sound team performances so far. They both have been potent upfront.
Now the million dollar question. Who will lift the cup on the 9th in
It will be an interesting week of football ahead. Perhaps not for the quality of football as much as for the unpredictability of it all.
[Sidin Sunny Vadukut is an avid blogger and proud author of a book which is currently undergoing a severe quality control program. He wishes to make it clear that he does not internalize too much. He once walked eleven kilometers in pouring rain because of a flash bus strike and the next day ate eighteen idlis with surprisingly little coconut chutney. You can read more of his work at http://sidin.blogspot.com]
{mosimage}
({mhauthor})
Also by
- Consultation Freeze - September 4th, 2006
- Need for Speed - August 28th, 2006
- Meals on wheels - August 14th, 2006
- Whither tomorrow - August 7th, 2006
- Bombay Dreams - August 7th, 2006
